Concepts of exhibiting ethnographic collections of the 18th century Kunstkamera of the Imperial Academy of Sciences

Authors

  • Margarita F. Khartanovich Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography Peter the Great (Kunstkamera), Russian Academy of Sciences, 3, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-6963
  • Maria V. Khartanovich Scientific-Research Museum of the Russian Academy of Arts, 17, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-9421

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu27.2020.206

Abstract

The exposition of the 18th century Kunstkamera of the Imperial Academy of Sciences was arranged according to the principle of a universal, all-encompassing presentation of the surrounding world through material monuments. Along with natural history collections, items related to the traditional spiritual and material culture of various peoples were displayed in the Kunstkamera. As part of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, the Kunstkamera was a kind of public presentation of the activities of academicians, reflecting the development of scientific knowledge in a particular area through the principles of organizing objects and their interpretation. This article analyzes the stages of exhibiting objects of traditional culture, their relationship and interdependence with the development of scientific interest in the “description of peoples”. In the first decades of public exposure for the Kunstkamera (1730s–1740s), the items of traditional culture of any nation were exhibited based on their functional purpose. Large-scale expeditionary geographic studies of Russia, begun by Peter I and continued during subsequent reigns, significantly expanded the body of information and materials stored and studied at the Imperial Academy of Sciences. The ethnographic assemblies received state “publication” during the ethnographic carnival, organized on the occasion of celebrations upon the signing of a peace treaty with the Ottoman Empire during the reign of Empress Anna Ioannovna. Since the end of the 1740s, due to the expeditionary research of the territories of the Russian Empire, the collection of ethnographic items has acquired a systemic classification character, which contributes to a reliable reflection of the system of organizing life sustainment for a certain people in specific territorial conditions. By the last decades of the 18th century, the ethnographic exposition of the Kunstkamera of the Imperial Academy of Sciences was the result of an integrated scientific approach to the presentation of the cultural diversity of the peoples of the Russian Empire.

Keywords:

Kunstkamera, ethnographic collection, ethnographic exposition, dummy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Беляев О. 1800. Кабинет Петра Великого. Ч. II. СПб.: Печатано в Императорской типографии.

Копанева Н. П., Чистов Ю. К. (отв. ред.), Хартанович М. Ф., Хартанович М. В. (авт.-сост.). 2014. Летопись Кунсткамеры. 1714–1836. СПб.: МАЭ РАН.

Погосян Е. А. 2001а. «И невозможное возможно»: Свадьба шутов в Ледяном доме как факт официальной культуры. Труды по русской и славянской филологии: Литературоведение. VI: 80–108.

Погосян Е. А. 2001b. Петр I — архитектор российской истории. СПб.: Искусство.

Радзюн А. Б., Хартанович М. В. 2015. Кунсткамера Петербургской Академии наук XVIII в.: у истоков антропологических знаний в России. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 23: Антропология 2: 114–122.

Синицын А. Ю. 2013. Иоганн Арнольд Штуцер: новые биографические сведения о собирателе японских коллекций Кунсткамеры XVIII в. Кюнеровский сборник: Материалы Восточноазиатских и Юго-Восточноазиатских исследований. 7: 227–234.

Станюкович Т. В. 1953. Кунсткамера Петербургской Академии наук. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР.

Станюкович Т. В. 1955. Художественное убранство и размещение экспозиции Петербургской Кунсткамеры. Сборник МАЭ XVI: 385–400.

Хартанович М. В. 2011. Манекены Кунсткамеры Петербургской Академии наук конца XVIII в. Радловский сборник: научные исследования и музейные проекты МАЭ РАН в 2010 г. СПб.: МАЭ РАН: 116–122.

Хартанович М. В. 2019. Принципы собирания этнографических коллекций для Кунсткамеры Императорской Академии наук: от сибирской экспедиции Д. Г. Мессершмидта (1719–1727) до Второй Камчатской экспедиции (1733–1743). Вестник НГУ. Серия: История, филология 18 (5). Археология, этнография: 36–49. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-5-36-49

Чистов Ю. К. 2017. Этнографические коллекции Кунсткамеры (1714–1836): к вопросу об институционализации этнографии как научной дисциплины в России. Уральский исторический вестник 4 (57): 136–143.

Элерт А. Х. 1999. Народы Сибири в трудах Г. Ф. Миллера. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН.


References

Beliaev O. 1800. Peter the Great’s Cabinet. V. II. St. Petersburg: Pechatano v Imperatorskoi tipografii Publ. (In Russian)

Chistov Iu. K. 2017. Ethnographic collections of Kunstkamera (1714–1836): on the problem of institualization ethnography as academic discipline in Russia. Ural’skii istoricheskii vestnik 4 (57): 136–143. (In Russian)

Elert A. Kh. 1999. Peoples of Siberia in the works by G. F. Miller. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo IAET SO RAN Publ. (In Russian)

Khartanovich M. V. 2011. Mannequins of the Academy’s of Sciences Kunstkamera in Petersburg in the late 18th century. Radlovskii sbornik: nauchnye issledovaniia i muzeinye proekty MAE RAN v 2010 g. St. Petersburg: MAE RAN Publ.: 116–122. (In Russian)

Khartanovich M. V. 2019. Principles of gathering the ethnographic collections for the Kunstkamera of the Imperial Academy of Sciences: from the Siberian expediton of D. G. Messerschmidt (1719–1727) till the Second Kamchatka Expedition (1733–1743). Vestnik NGU. Seriia: Istoriia, filologiia 18 (5). Arkheologiia, etnografiia: 36–49. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-5-36-49 (In Russian)

Kopaneva N. P., Chistov Iu. K. (ed.), Khartanovich M. F., Khartanovich M. V. (authors). 2014. Kunstkamera Chronicles. 1714–1836. St. Petersburg: MAE RAN Publ. (In Russian)

Pogosian E. A. 2001a. “Unpossible is possible”: Marriage of the fools in the Ice house as event of official culture. Trudy po russkoi i slavianskoi filologii: Literaturovedenie VI: 80–108. (In Russian)

Pogosian E. A. 2001b. Peter I — architect of Russian history. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)

Radziun A. B., Khartanovich M. V. 2015. Kunstkamera of St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences of the 18th century: at the origins of anthropological knowledge in Russian. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 23: Antropologiia 2: 114–122. (In Russian)

Sinitsyn A. Iu. 2013. Iogann Arnold Shtutser: new biographic data on collector of Japanese collections of the 18th-century Kunstkamera. Kiunerovskii sbornik: Materialy Vostochnoaziatskikh i Iugo-Vostochnoaziatskikh issledovanii 7: 227–234. (In Russian)

Staniukovich T. V. 1953. Kunstkamera of the Academy of Sciences in Petersburg. Moscow; Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR Publ. (In Russian)

Staniukovich T. V. 1955. Artistic decoration and arrangement of exposition of Petersburg Kunstkamera. Sbornik MAE XVI: 385–400. (In Russian)

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Khartanovich, M. F., & Khartanovich, M. V. (2020). Concepts of exhibiting ethnographic collections of the 18<sup>th</sup> century Kunstkamera of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. The Issues of Museology, 11(2), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu27.2020.206

Issue

Section

History, theory and practice of museum exposition