The actor-network theory of B. Latur and porcelain services of classicism: the relevance of a museological discussion

Authors

  • Tatiana A. Litvin St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-3776

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu27.2019.101

Abstract

In this article an attempt is made to tell about the actor-network theory of the French sociologist B. Latur in application to the history of the creation and existence of ceremonial services of the second half of the 18th century. For demonstration of separate provisions of the theory of Latur, the most known porcelain and faience services of the German, French, English and Russian manufactories from the era of early and strict classicism were chosen. The author tells about the transition of motives and forms from the Sevres “Service with cameos” and the “Berlin” service to Russian “Arabeskovy”, “Kabinetsky”, “The Dowry” and other services. The article mentions the silver services executed by the Parisian masters J.-N. Roettiers, R.-J. Auguste, etc., for the brothers Orlov, who helped Catherine II to occupy the throne, and also silver services for deputies of the new provinces founded by the Russian empress. The history of the creation of services illustrates a continuous chain of administrative reforms, military conflicts, political and personal events and also changes in artistic taste. By means of the ceremonial objects on which ware was carried for ceremonial lunches, the European monarchs not only subtly affected style and fashion in Russia, but also skillfully played politics. While Catherine II accepted gifts and made large orders for European and domestic production, she successfully engaged with her closest partners in diplomacy and economy, waged information war, and made dynastic plans. Many facts specified in the article prove that Bruno Latur’s concept about the active impact of things on social and political relations is confirmed in practice. Latur’s approach to studying material monuments, artifacts, and decorative arts is demanded by the modern science of history of art.

Keywords:

Bruno Latur, actor-network theory, arts and crafts, porcelain, services, Catherine II, material culture, method

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

Akimova L. I. 1994. The Ancient World: a Thing and a Myth. Voprosy iskusstvoznaniia (Moscow) 2–3: 53–93. (In Russian)

Ananiev V. G. 2013. Leicester School of Museology: History, Personalities, Ideas. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoria 2: 127–134. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lesterskaya-shkola-muzeologii-istoriya-personalii-idei (accessed 22.02.2017). (In Russian)

Ananiev V. G. 2016. Museum and museum subject in the structural-semiotic perspective: to the analysis of the concept of E. Taborsky. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kultury i iskusstva 4 (29): 64–68. URL: http://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_27370943_63777749.pdf (accessed 13.02.2017). (In Russian)

Bagdasarova I. R. 2011. Ancient reminiscences in the Russian imperial porcelain of the second half of the 18th century: diss. … kand. iskusstvovedeniia. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)

Burg T. 2004. Porzellan und Politik. Die sachsisch-russischen Beziehungen des 18 Jahrhunderts im Spiegel diplomatischer Geschenke. Meissen fűr die Zaren. Műnchen: Hirmer Verlag: 9–24.

Erofeeva M. A. 2015. Actor-network theory and the problem of social action. Sociologia vlasti 27 (1). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/aktorno-setevaya-teoriya-i-problema-sotsialnogo-deystviya (accessed 24.04.2017). (In Russian)

Frolova L. M. (intr., comp.) Applied art of France 17th–20th centuries. From baroque to suprematism. Catalogue. Moscow: Avangard. (In Russian)

Karpova E. V. 1999. Jacques-Dominique Rachett in Russia Jak-Dominik Rashett. 1744–1809. Katalog vystavky. St. Petersburg: Gosudarstvennii Russkii muzei, Palace Editions: 3–18. (In Russian)

Kavanagh G. 1999. Making Histories, Making Memories. Making Histories in Museums: 1–14.

Kazakova V. V. 2009. Private collections of decorative art in the context of Russian culture 18th — early 19th centuries: diss. … kand. iskusstvovedeniia. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)

Knabe G. S. 1986. The image of everyday things as a source of historical knowledge. Vestch v iskusstve. Materialy nauchnoi konferenzii “Vipperovskie chtenia–84” . GMII im. A. S. Pushkina, Moscow: 259–301. (In Russian)

Kudriyavzeva A. 1995. Things — Stars: “Orlov’s” service. Sezony. Hroniki rossiyskoi hudozhestvennoi zhizni. Moscow: Galereiia “Vremena goda” Publ.: 209–220. (In Russian)

Kudriyavzeva T. V. 1984. “Orlov’s” service of the Imperial porcelain factory in St. Petersburg. Soobstchenie Gosudarsvennogo Ermitazha 24: 23–26. (In Russian)

Kudriyavzeva T. V. 2003. Russian Imperial Porcelain. St. Petersburg: Slavia Publ. (In Russian)

Latur B. 2014. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Networked Theory. Perevod s angliiskogo I. Polonskoy, pod red. S. Gavrilenko. Moscow: Vysshcaia shkola ekonomiki Publ. URL: https://profilib.net/chtenie/28921/bruno-latur-peresborka-sotsialnogo-vvedenie-v-aktorno-setevuyu-teoriyu.php (accessed 23.05.2018). (In Russian)

Latur B. 2006. We Have Never Been Modern. Essays on symmetric anthropology. St. Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropeiskogo universiteta. (In Russian)

Lopato M. N. 2010. Silver service “three times more than usual”. Nashe nasledie 95: 21–24. URL: http://www.nasledie-rus.ru/podshivka/9505.php (accessed 19.05.2018). (In Russian)

Mensh P. van. 2014. Meaning: functional identity of artifacts. Voprosy muzeologii 1 (9): 177–192. (In Russian)

Polonskaya I. N. 2012. B. Latour’s alternative sociology: to the characterization of methodology. Teoriia i praktika obstchestvennogo razvitia 6. Krasnodar: Hors: 72–75. URL: http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2012/6/sоciоlоgiyа/polonskaya.pdf (accessed 10.03.2017). (In Russian)

Sipovskaya N. V. 1998. Services of Awards. Pinakoteka (Moscow) 5: 17–21. (In Russian)

Smith L. 2013. The “Patrimonial Mirrorˮ: Narcissistic Illusion or Multiple Reflections? Voprosy museologii 2 (8): 27–44. URL: http://voprosi-muzeologii.spbu.ru/files/2013_2/Smit.pdf (accessed 09.03.2017). (In Russian)

Taborsky E. 1990. The Discursive Object. Pearce S. (ed.) Objects of Knowledge. London: Ahlone Press: 50–77.

Taborsky E. 1982. The Sociostructural Role of the Museum. The International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship 1 (4): 339–345.

Wolf N. B. von etc. 1906. Imperial porcelain factory 1744–1904. St. Petersburg: Izdanie Upravlenia imperatorskimi zavodami. (In Russian)

Yureneva T. Y. 2004. Museology. Moscow: Akademichesky proekt Publ. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2019-10-29

How to Cite

Литвин, Т. (2019). The actor-network theory of B. Latur and porcelain services of classicism: the relevance of a museological discussion. The Issues of Museology, 10(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu27.2019.101

Issue

Section

Theoretical basement of museology