The dragon motif in Far Eastern porcelain: Towards attribution problems

Authors

  • Tatyana A. Litvin St. Petersburg University, 7–9, University emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu27.2023.104

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of a typical Chinese figurative motif  — a dragon, in porcelain objects of the Ming and Qing dynasties and in works of Japanese ceramic art of the Meiji era. The approach to the study of decorative and applied art from the point of view of the motive has been repeatedly tested by the author when compiling typological series of antique motifs in the decorative and applied art of Russian classicism. The novelty of this article is that for the first time more than fifty Chinese and Japanese objects with dragons dating from the 14th — early 20th centuries originating from the National Museum of Chine, the Shanghai and Nanjing Museums, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the National Museum in Tokyo, the Victoria and Albert Museum, the State Hermitage Museum, as well as from several private collections. The following features were compared: posture, body position, color scheme, the nature of the background, as well as whether the dragon image is single or paired, the painting is made underglaze or overglaze, in the form of a flat or relief image. The early stage of the 14th–16th centuries it does not allow us to find prototypes of dragon images in the past, but still the author has collected certain information about cases of reflection of the dragon theme in Chinese cultural monuments. The objects of the 18th and, especially, the 19th centuries serve as a good material to find in the art of the bygone eras of the Celestial Empire the previous artistic interpretations of dragons. In the final part of the article, an overview of dragon images in Japanese ceramic art is presented, the reasons for the migration of this motif caused by the victory of Japan, as a competitor, in the Far Eastern porcelain market are substantiated.

Keywords:

dragon motif, Chinese porcelain, Ming dynasty, Qing dynasty, Japanese porcelain

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Гольский И.А. 2015. Коллекция китайского фарфора Западно-Сибирского отдела Императорского Русского географического общества. Образ Поднебесной. Взгляд из Европы. Материалы XXI Царскосельской научной конференции. СПб.: 77–90.

Кубе А.Н. 1923. История фаянса. Берлин: Р.С.Ф.С.Р. Государственное издательство.

Кузьменко Л. 2005. Атрибуция китайского фарфора. Антиквариат, предметы искусства и коллекционирования 27: 64. URL: https://antiqueland.ru/articles/1594/ (дата обращения: 29.12.2022).

Литвин Т.А. 2017. Антикизирующие формы и направления в русском декоративно-прикладном искусстве последней четверти XVIII века. Дис. … канд. искусствоведения. СПб. URL: https://rusmuseum.ru/upload/iblock/1fa/litvin-tekst-dissertatsii_27.07.2017.pdf (дата обращения: 07.12.2022).

Логинов В., Скальский Ю. 2001. И Ваши дни благословенны… Из истории российской керамики. М.: Алгоритм.

Люй Цзечжан. 2006. История и художественно-технологические особенности китайского расписного фарфора «цинхуа». Известия РГПУ им. А.И.Герцена 5 (23): 53–57.

Мартынова Н.В., Цзе Лян. 2015. Технико-художественные особенности росписи фарфора в эпоху династии Мин. Инновации в социокультурном пространстве: мат-лы VIII Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Т.I.Благовещенск: Амурский государственный университет: 44–48.

Моран А. де. 2011. История декоративно-прикладного искусства: От древнейших времен до наших дней. М.: Изд-во В.Шевчук.Поточкина Л.В., Меньшикова М.Л., Пчелин Н.Г. (авт. ст.). 2021. Пять символов счастья. Благопо-желания в китайском искусстве XVII–XX вв. Каталог выставки из собрания Государственного Эрмитажа. Общ. ред. М.Б.Пиотровского. СПб.: Славия.

Чжан Цзин. 2020. Динамика символов дракона и феникса в китайских ювелирных изделиях. Карти-на мира через призму китайской и белорусской культур: Сб. ст. междунар. науч.-практ. конф., Минск, 06 декабря 2019 г. Ред. М.В.Мишкевич и др. Минск: Белорусский государственный экономический университет. С. 160–164. URL: http://edoc.bseu.by:8080/bitstream/edoc/82961/1

Chzhan_Tszin.pdf (дата обращения: 23.10.2022).

Burg T. 2004. Porzellan und Politik. Die sächsisch-russischen Beziehungen des 18 Jahrhunderts im Spiegel diplomatischer Geschenke. Meissen fűr die Zaren. Vorwort U.Pietsch. Műnchen: Hirmer Verlag: 9–24.

Fang L. 2009. Chinese Ceramics. A history of Elegance. Transl. by W.W.Wang. China Intercontinental Press.

Irvine G. 2016. Imperial Japan Meiji to Taishō. Japanese Art and Design. Ed. by G.Irvine. London: V & A Publishing: 157–181.

References

Burg T. 2004. Porzellan und Politik. Die sächsisch-russischen Beziehungen des 18 Jahrhunderts im Spiegel diplomatischer Geschenke. Meissen fűr die Zaren. Vorwort U.Pietsch. Műnchen: Hirmer Verlag: 9–24.

Gol’skii I.A. 2015. Collection of Chinese porcelain of the West Siberian Department of the Imperial Russian

Geographical Society. Obraz Podnebesnoi. Vzgliad iz Evropy. Materialy XXI Tsarskosel’skoi nauchnoi konferetsii. St. Petersburg: 77–90. (In Russian)

Fang L. 2009. Chinese Ceramics. A history of Elegance. Translated by W.W.Wang. China intercontinental press.

Irvine G. 2016. Imperial Japan Meiji to Taishō. Japanese Art and Design. Ed. by G.Irvine. London: V & A Publishing: 157–181.

Kube A.N. 1923. History of faience. Berlin: R.S.F.S.R. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo Publ. (In Russian)

Kuzmenko L. 2005. Attribution of Chinese porcelain. Antikvariat, predmety iskusstva i kollektsionirovaniia27: 64. Available at: https://antiqueland.ru/articles/1594/ (accessed: 29.12.2022). (In Russian)

Litvin T.A. 2017. Antique forms and direction in Russian decorative and applied art of the last quarter of the 18th century. PhD thesis. St. Petersburg: State Russian Museum. Available at: https://rusmuseum.ru/upload/iblock/1fa/litvin-tekst-dissertatsii_27.07.2017.pdf (accessed: 07.12.2022). (In Russian)

Loginov V., Skal’skii Iu. 2001. And your days are blessed…: From the history of Russian ceramics. Moscow: Algoritm Publ. (In Russian)

Lu Jiezhang. 2006. History and artistic and technological features of Chinese painted porcelain “Tsinghua”. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences 5 (23): 53–57. (In Russian)

Martynova N.V., Tsze Lian. 2015. Technical and artistic features of porcelain painting in the era of the Ming dynasty. Innovatsii v sotsiokulturnom prostranstve: mat-ly VIII Mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. Vol.I. Blagoveshchensk: Amur State University: 44–48. (In Russian)

Moran A.de. 2011. History of decorative and applied art: From ancient times to the present day. Moscow: V. Shevchuk Publ. (In Russian)

Potochkinа L.V., Men’shikova M.L., Pchelkin N.G. 2021. Five symbols of happiness. Benevolence in Chinese art of the 17th–20th centuries. Exhibition catalog from the collection of the State Hermitage Museum.Exec. ed. M.B.Piotrovskii. St. Petersburg: Slaviia Publ. (In Russian)

Zhan Jing. 2020. Dynamics of the dragon and Phoenix symbols in Chinese jewelry. Kartina mira cherez prizmu kitaiskoi i belorusskoi kul’tur: Sb. st. mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf., Minsk, 06 dekabria 2019 g. Ed. by. M.V.Mishkevich et al. Minsk: Belarus State Economic University: 160–164. Available at: http://edoc.bseu.by:8080/bitstream/edoc/82961/1/Chzhan_Tszin.pdf (accessed: 23.10.2022). (In Russian)

Published

2023-10-29

How to Cite

Litvin, T. A. (2023). The dragon motif in Far Eastern porcelain: Towards attribution problems. The Issues of Museology, 14(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu27.2023.104

Issue

Section

Museum collections